Dear former colleagues,
is August 16 and the 12:10. I just finished talking on the phone with Ivan, who confirmed to me that, at Catania, a judge has lifted the reserve and fixed the next hearing for May 2011, giving an end to the Regional Commission for use up to ten days before the hearing to settle the notorious training project, the agreement, ie, between the company and the region, which is upstream of all of our CFL. Another term! He had already granted one to Serit to produce the same document. But it takes time to understand that if this document does not check out, and "should be" an act registered in a filing with the date certain, with all the characteristics of form and substance required by law, very easy, that is, to find, any reason, or perhaps more one, there will be? So much for protection!
is yet another intolerable delay bleak: mistakes of clerks, waltz for the competence of courts, referrals a year to listen to one witness. We are talking about where they should APPEALS OF WORK reign of three principles of orality, immediacy and concentration. Crap they teach you at university, to pass the exam of Civil Procedure but break up in court.
'm telling you this latest development, to share with you the hallucinatory stupor as the timing of Justice. You may agree that a first instance of an action for ten years hard work? You can accept that in all courts, although as actors 220 PUBLIC OFFICIALS, not 1 or 2 enhanced, not otherwise eligible or name if not by the public prosecutor and with full functions, which have carried out a public function for the state, you lose time between orders and stocks, rather than immediately realize that our business could not be conveyed or suggested in any way or menate of this kind, so much so that the signatures and responsibilities, including criminal penalties, the first day, all the acts, could not but be personal and in no way endorsed, and that no one could or should have bother to interfere with or assist or help? Where else were corrections or charges? Which administrative clerk, the last until the Director, we could never afford it? Who, in the collector's office, has never had the power? Questions and parliamentary motions indicate that the recently adopted policy has finally understood everything.
It is possible that only the courts fatichino? It is a cause so trivial and obvious that everyone should get the easy equation: qualification possessed "ex lege" immediate work independently and CFL = unlawful. They wanted a test? Where the discharges were not enough to date or historical activities, they could have, at best, ask the company to 23 people, and that's it. Finished! What else do they seek?
We are wasting a lot of time and will not allow us to be properly compensated. Instead of doing justice and giving beatings specimens, are doing so that he slipped out of the MPS and the policy we put a piece at no cost. We are outraged that the State has authorized such contracts enable companies to taking advantage of huge relief, and resulting in recruitment of the 39 administrative double cfl (derivation of home policy)? We should still indignant more than a rough surface and slow with which we are protected by the State!
Kisses, Flavia.
is yet another intolerable delay bleak: mistakes of clerks, waltz for the competence of courts, referrals a year to listen to one witness. We are talking about where they should APPEALS OF WORK reign of three principles of orality, immediacy and concentration. Crap they teach you at university, to pass the exam of Civil Procedure but break up in court.
'm telling you this latest development, to share with you the hallucinatory stupor as the timing of Justice. You may agree that a first instance of an action for ten years hard work? You can accept that in all courts, although as actors 220 PUBLIC OFFICIALS, not 1 or 2 enhanced, not otherwise eligible or name if not by the public prosecutor and with full functions, which have carried out a public function for the state, you lose time between orders and stocks, rather than immediately realize that our business could not be conveyed or suggested in any way or menate of this kind, so much so that the signatures and responsibilities, including criminal penalties, the first day, all the acts, could not but be personal and in no way endorsed, and that no one could or should have bother to interfere with or assist or help? Where else were corrections or charges? Which administrative clerk, the last until the Director, we could never afford it? Who, in the collector's office, has never had the power? Questions and parliamentary motions indicate that the recently adopted policy has finally understood everything.
It is possible that only the courts fatichino? It is a cause so trivial and obvious that everyone should get the easy equation: qualification possessed "ex lege" immediate work independently and CFL = unlawful. They wanted a test? Where the discharges were not enough to date or historical activities, they could have, at best, ask the company to 23 people, and that's it. Finished! What else do they seek?
We are wasting a lot of time and will not allow us to be properly compensated. Instead of doing justice and giving beatings specimens, are doing so that he slipped out of the MPS and the policy we put a piece at no cost. We are outraged that the State has authorized such contracts enable companies to taking advantage of huge relief, and resulting in recruitment of the 39 administrative double cfl (derivation of home policy)? We should still indignant more than a rough surface and slow with which we are protected by the State!
Kisses, Flavia.
